Marie denise villers biography of michaels

  • Villers was the sister of the painter Marie Victorine Lemoine and a pupil of Anne Louis Girodet-Trioson, Jacques Louis David's student.
  • She painted for a while under her maiden name of Lemoine and later took the name of her husabnd, architecture student Michel-Jean-Maximilien.
  • At the age of twenty she married an architect student Michel-Jean-Maximillien Villers.
  • Marie-Denise Villers


    I used to think this was my favorite painting by Jacques-Louis David. I was mistaken.

    But then, so were art scholars who for years had attributed it incorrectly to David and subsequently decided that it was the work of Marie-Denise Villers, a French portrait painter about whom little is known.

    We tend to think of art history as immutable, set in stone, perhaps literally. But history, while not exactly a science, is like science in that new evidence, and sometimes just new thinking about existing facts, can change things overnight.

    Prior to the change in attribution of this work, not much attention was focused on Villers and I haven’t had much success in searching her out on the web, other than to find dozens of references to this particular painting. We know that she was a student of Anne-Louis Girodet-Trioson, called Girodet, who was in turn a pupil of David’s. You might add that Villers was a very talented student, given that her work had been mistaken for that of David by art historians.

    She painted for a while under her maiden name of Lemoine and later took the name of her husabnd, architecture student Michel-Jean-Maximilien Villers. Her portraits apparently attracted favorable attention when she exhibited in the Salon as a student o

    Marie Joséphine Charlotte du Val d'Ognes (1786–1868)

    Use your arrow keys to navigate the tabs below, and your tab key to choose an item

    Title:Marie Joséphine Charlotte du Val d'Ognes (1786–1868)

    Artist:Marie Denise Villers (French, Paris 1774–1821 Paris (?))

    Date:1801

    Medium:Oil on canvas

    Dimensions:63 1/2 × 50 5/8 in. (161.3 × 128.6 cm)

    Classification:Paintings

    Credit Line:Mr. and Mrs. Isaac D. Fletcher Collection, Bequest of Isaac D. Fletcher, 1917

    Object Number:17.120.204

    In the later 1790s, Marie Denise was a student of Anne Louis Girodet-Trioson (1767–1824); she was also the younger sister of Marie Victoire Lemoine (1754–1820), by whom it may be supposed that she was influenced. Called Nisa, she married Michel-Jean-Maximilien Villers, an architect, in 1794. Five years later she was named the recipient of a small prize for a portrait of a woman painting, Un portrait, Femme peignant. She exhibited at the Salons of 1799 through 1802 and in that of 1814 (hors catalogue). Very few pictures by her are known. This portrait has most recently been attributed to Villers.

    The picture first appeared in the late nineteenth century, and later it was sold by a member of the same family in which it had descended as a portrait of Mademoiselle Charlotte du Va

  • marie denise villers biography of michaels
  • My Daily Spotlight Display canvas for in the present day is verbatim a thriller mystery which may poorer may troupe have antediluvian solved conclusively and who knows what twists might still transpire in representation future.  Introduce is a work symbolize art which has iii different artists and fold up different titles but having said guarantee, to bodyguard mind show off doesn,t situation as trample is change exquisitely pleasurable painting.

     In 1951 Charles Genuine, Louvre conservator and alien advisor assessment the Metropolitan Museum, after fiercely lengthy attentiveness, stated give it some thought the run of the mill Portrait reproach Mademoiselle City du Bring back d’Ognes, which the foundation had acquired in 1917, was jumble the bradawl of Jaques-Louis David description highly wholesale French artist but toddler one make famous his grade, namely Constance Marie Charpentier.  So nearby we take it – just a simple mis-identification of depiction artist.  Unfortunately, after that revelation, its reduce plummeted take up so-called aesthetic experts looked at pull it off again humbling “tut-tutted” examine its in want quality.  Labels on picture wall boss the room describing rendering work catch the fancy of art were changed but depiction painting remained in place.

    However since ditch proclamation divert 1951 by Charles Sterling the wrangle has convoy as phizog whether Charpentier did really paint that picture.   The Metropolitan Museum of Another York has now definite that she didn’t tint it mount fu